Content marketing: Telling Meaningful Stories

Why editing for preference is the biggest waste of time in content marketing 


Everyone who creates content likely has had an editor who edited for preference only.

They change words because they like another word better. Not because it actually makes a difference to the audience or impacts that story’s performance.

I even once had an editor who admitted that he edited to “add value, and it’s my job.” That was true for the moment.

OMG, people – I mean editors – who are people, too. If your preference is “no acronyms” that stands for OH MY GOD (or GOSH) – again, depending on your preference.

See, that paragraph was a total waste of time. LOL.

Preferential editors with perceived or actual power over writers are part of a group of today’s content marketers that I call obstructionist marketers. Marketers in that group add unnecessary processes and barriers and, in general, slow things down. Many times to a halt. Usually it’s all unnecessary, and they end up asking why it hasn’t worked yet! Well, because we’ve been busy slowing things to a halt.

They don’t like something? They’ll schedule 48 committee and sub-committee meetings, and by the time you are done, you forget what prompted the meetings. They wrap you in a bubble of business – I mean busyness. Despite the closeness in spelling, busyness hardly ever leads to business in content marketing. Deliberate busyness that shares useful content does, though.

Marketing obstructionists also aren’t a generational thing – for everyone getting ready to blame the Baby Boomers or Millenials here. I’ve seen members in both groups and the ones in between.

Please hold the letters to the editor defending marketing obstructionists or preferential editors. No. 1, this isn’t a newspaper and I don’t publish letters to the editor. No. 2, I’m not against editors (or marketers) at all. Just the ones that add no value.

I’ve worked with fantastic editors. Ones that made my work better. Much better. Ones that saved me from publishing embarrassing mistakes. Ones that explained the difference in similar words to me.

Great editors:

  • Make the work better.
  • Find a way to get it published.
  • Teach their writers when teaching is actually needed.
  • Explain their edits. (For example: This is not in-line with the strategy.)
  • Break down barriers – instead of putting them up.
  • Are not rude.
  • Never look down on writers, which is measured by how they talk with writers and how writers perceive that communication.

I’m all for high-quality content, but one person’s preference isn’t the deciding factor here. I remember days when I was part of a project that took forever, and when the piece was finally in that perfect stage, it was published.

And then we called a committee meeting to launch an investigation into why nobody was reading it. It was perfect, after all. LOL.

They weren’t reading it because we missed:

  • The window of opportunity when people actually cared about it.
  • That our “perfect” wasn’t the audience’s “perfect.”
  • That distribution was just as important as the production.
  • That our process needed to evolve from 20 years ago.
  • Admitting some people’s egos were the barriers.

If you edit to make content more relevant to the audience and catch mistakes – thank you. Keep going. Stay audience-centric.

If you edit and only think of yourself – stop.

Here’s to letting the best published stories win.


Don't miss the next blog post:

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Christoph

Christoph blogs on The Authentic Storytelling Project and is a globally recognized content marketing expert. The IMA named him Internet Marketer of the Year in 2015. He works with healthcare organizations and other brands around the globe.

Related Posts

How do we know whether or not a new technology will actually improve our healthcare experience?

The Healthcare Leadership Chat on Tuesdays on Twitter is one of my favorite Twitter chats. On May 23, 2017, the topic covers technology in healthcare. That’s like three important and favorite topics of mine in one: Twitter (social media), technology and also customer/patient experience. I’ll try to participate live – as always – but also wanted […]

Read More

Why it’s actually important to talk about politics or at least pay attention

Many of us are taught – or  believe – to not talk about politics.  I even remember when I was growing up in the 1980s and 1990s my family didn’t. People went to vote and that was that. Nothing to discuss.  But it was also  a rather uneventful time period. Yes, there were conflicts and […]

Read More

Updates in your inbox! No spam!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Hire your next content marketing strategist here

Is it okay to swear in blog posts?

My Authentic Storytelling Book

book cover crop

"Get Real: Telling Authentic Stories for Long-term Success" discusses why you, your organization and anyone really should consider sharing authentic stories with each other ... READ MORE

My customer service book

Confirmed talks

Druck

Berlin, Germany
June 29, 2017

Raleigh, NC
Aug. 22, 2017

sao-paolo

book now

Speaking feedback

Top twitter accounts to follow for marketing

Top 10 Content Marketer

on Klout 2016

klout





Official PayPal Seal

Quotes

social media book

Stories from the Social Side Book

%d bloggers like this: